136
from this Embassy (e.g. my despatches Nos. 318 and 362 of the 19th May and the 2nd June, 1938) that
of late years a certain amount of encouragement has been given in influential quarters to the supporters
of Islam in Japan, and while the measure was under
discussion in the House of Peers Dr. Hijikata, a
distinguished lawyer, asked the reason why
Christianity alone was mentioned in the bill in
addition to Shinto and Buddhism. He pointed out
that there were large numbers of Mohammedans in Asia who were friendly to Japan, that generally speaking Mohammedans were opposed to communism, and that
in the north-western parts of China they were "on the front line of defence against Russia", the
common enemy of both Japan and Islam. Moreover,
a mosque had recently been completed in Tokyo and
it was a pity, he thought, to disregard these facts
and virtually to ignore Mohammedaniem from a legal
point of view, thereby possibly giving offence. He
further asked in particular what would be the position
of the Mosques in Japan as regards exemption from
taxation.
7.
In reply to Dr. Hijikata General Araki
explained that while Mohammedaniem was undoubtedly
one of the three great religions of the world and
was recognised as such, the bill before the Diet
had been designed to control religious bodies which
were at the moment active in Japan. This could not
be said of Mohammedaniam.
Meanwhile, however,
Mohammedanism
/
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.